Navigation auf uzh.ch

Suche

CHESS - Center for Higher Education and Science Studies

2019

Arlt, D., Rauchfleisch, A., & Schäfer, M. S. (2019). Between Fragmentation and Dialogue. Twitter Communities and Political Debate About the Swiss “Nuclear Withdrawal Initiative.” Environmental Communication, 13(4), 440–456. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2018.1430600

Ayaita, A., Pull, K., & Backes-Gellner, U. (2019). You get what you ‘pay’ for: academic attention, career incentives and changes in publication portfolios of business and economics researchers. Journal of Business Economics, 89(3), 273–290. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-017-0880-6

Backes-Gellner, U., Böhringer, C., Cantner, U., Harhoff, D., Hölzle, K., & Schnitzer, M. (2019a). Commission of Experts for Research and Innovation – 2019 “Research, Innovation and Technological Performance in Germany.” Buch- und Offsetdruckerei H. Heenemann GmbH & Co. KG. https://www.zora.uzh.ch

Backes-Gellner, U., Böhringer, C., Cantner, U., Harhoff, D., Hölzle, K., & Schnitzer, M. (2019b). EFI-Jahresgutachten 2019 “Forschung, Innovation und technologische Leistungsfähigkeit Deutschlands” (Expertenkommission Forschung und Innovation (EFI), Ed.). Buch- und Offsetdruckerei H. Heenemann GmbH & Co. KG. https://www.zora.uzh.ch

Beywl, W., Böttcher, W., Hense, J., & Widmer, T. (2019). Vorläufer, Entstehung und Weiterentwicklung der Standards für Evaluation. In J. Hense, W. Böttcher, M. Kalman, & W. Meyer (Eds.), Evaluation: Standards in unterschiedlichen Handlungsfeldern einheitliche Qualitätsansprüche trotz heterogener Praxis? (pp. 15–34). Waxmann Verlag.

Bonfadelli, H. (2019a). Die Wissenskluft-Perspektive: Zum Einfluss von Kognitionen und Emotionen. In H. Schramm, J. Matthes, & C. Schemer (Eds.), Emotions Meet Cognitions: Zum Zusammenspiel von emotionalen und kognitiven Prozessen in der Medienrezeptions- und Medienwirkungsforschung (pp. 73–82). Springer Fachmedien. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-25963-1_6

Bonfadelli, H. (2019b). Nutzung und Wirkung von Hochschulkommunikation. In B. Fähnrich, J. Metag, S. Post, & M. S. Schäfer (Eds.), Forschungsfeld Hochschulkommunikation (pp. 393–413). Springer Fachmedien. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-22409-7_18

Bos, W., Daniel, H. D., Hannover, B., Köller, O., Lenzen, D., McElvany, N., Rossbach, H.-G., Seidel, T., Tippelt, R., & Wössman, L. (2019). Region und Bildung. Mythos Stadt - Land (Vereinigung der Bayerischen Wirtschaft, Ed.; 1. Auflage). Waxmann.

Bucchi, M. (2019a). A Paper is like a Horse – and a Book is like a Whale? Sociologica, Vol 13, 9-11 Pages. https://doi.org/10.6092/ISSN.1971-8853/9379

Bucchi, M. (2019b). Facing the challenges of science communication 2.0: quality, credibility and expertise. EFSA Journal, 17(Proceedings of the Third EFSA Scientific Conference: Science, Food and Society Guest Editors: Devos Y, Elliott KC and Hardy A). https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.e170702

Bucchi, M. (2019c). Science in society discussed with my father: A parting editorial in the form of a dialogue. Public Understanding of Science, 28(5), 514–518. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662519851612

Busemeyer, M. R., & Garritzmann, J. L. (2019). Bildungspolitik und der Sozialinvestitionsstaat. In H. Obinger & M. G. Schmidt (Eds.), Handbuch Sozialpolitik (pp. 783–805). Springer Fachmedien. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-22803-3_38

Christian Wassmer, & Carole Probst. (2019).Wettbewerb und Kooperation in der Nutzung von Absolventenstudien in der Schweiz. https://doi.org/10.3217/ZFHE-14-04/11

Criblez, L. (2019). Die gymnasiale Matur als allgemeiner Hochschulzulassungsausweis: bildungshistorische Reminiszenzen. In D. Holtsch, M. Oepke, & S. Schumann (Eds.), Lehren und Lernen auf der Sekundarstufe II: Gymnasial- und wirtschaftspädagogische Perspektiven (pp. 96–108). hep Verlag. https://www.zora.uzh.ch

Daniel, H.-D. (2019a). Hochschule. In Vereinigung der Bayerischen Wirtschaft (Ed.), Region und Bildung. Mythos Stadt - Land (1. Auflage, pp. 153–178). Waxmann.

Daniel, H.-D. (2019b). Lutz Bornmann: Recipient of the 2019 Derek John de Solla Price Medal. Scientometrics, 121(3), 1235–1238. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03251-4

Daniel, H.-D., Krempkow, R., & Schmidt, U. (2019). Einführung der geschäftsführenden Herausgeber. Qualität in der Wissenschaft, 13(3+4), 64–65. https://www.research-collection.ethz.ch/handle/20.500.11850/388955

Dingwerth, K., & Kordts-Freudinger, R. (2019). Kompetenzen vor Inhalte: Die Kleine Reihe Hochschuldidaktik Politik. Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft, 29(3), 449–457. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41358-019-00195-2

Fähnrich, B., Metag, J., Post, S., & Schäfer, M. S. (2019). Hochschulkommunikation aus kommunikationswissenschaftlicher Perspektive. In B. Fähnrich, J. Metag, S. Post, & M. S. Schäfer (Eds.), Forschungsfeld Hochschulkommunikation (pp. 1–21). Springer Fachmedien. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-22409-7_1

Fähnrich, B., Metag, J., Post, S., Schäfer, M. S., Fähnrich, B., Metag, J., Post, S., & Schäfer, M. S. (Eds.). (2019). Forschungsfeld Hochschulkommunikation. Springer Fachmedien. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-22409-7_1

Fähnrich, B., & Schäfer, M. S. (2019). Partizipative Hochschulkommunikation. In B. Fähnrich, J. Metag, S. Post, & M. S. Schäfer (Eds.), Forschungsfeld Hochschulkommunikation (pp. 227–245). Springer Fachmedien. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-22409-7_11

Füchslin, T., Schäfer, M. S., & Metag, J. (2019). Who wants to be a citizen scientist? Identifying the potential of citizen science and target segments in Switzerland. Public Understanding of Science, 28(6), 652–668. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662519852020

Giménez-Toledo, E., Mañana-Rodríguez, J., Engels, T. C. E., Guns, R., Kulczycki, E., Ochsner, M., Pölönen, J., Sivertsen, G., & Zuccala, A. A. (2019). Taking scholarly books into account, part II: a comparison of 19 European countries in evaluation and funding. Scientometrics, 118(1), 233–251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2956-7

Hendriks, B., Reinhart, M., & Schendzielorz, C. (2019). Keine Exzellenz ohne Mittelklasse! Komplexe Dynamiken globaler und lokaler Entwicklungen. Verhandlungen des 39. Kongresses der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Soziologie in Göttingen 2018., 39. https://publikationen.soziologie.de

Herfeld, C., & Doehne, M. (2019). The diffusion of scientific innovations: A role typology. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 77, 64–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2017.12.001

Herfeld, C., & Lisciandra, C. (2019). Knowledge transfer and its contexts. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 77, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2019.06.002

Hesselmann, F., & Reinhart, M. (2019). Science Means Never Having to Say You’re Sorry? Apologies for Scientific Misconduct. Science Communication, 41(5), 552–579. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547019860848

Hoeschler, P., & Backes-Gellner, U. (2019). Shooting for the Stars and Failing: College Dropout and Self-Esteem (Working Paper No. 0100; Economics of Education Working Paper Series). Swiss Leading House “Economics of Education.” https://ideas.repec.org/p/iso/educat/0100.html

Jerke, J., Johann, D., Rauhut, H., & Thomas, K. (2019). Too sophisticated even for highly educated survey respondents? A qualitative assessment of indirect question formats for sensitive questions. Survey Research Methods, 13(3), 319–351. https://doi.org/10.18148/srm/2019.v13i3.7453

Johann, D., & Mayer, S. J. (2019). The Perception of Scientific Authorship Across Domains. Minerva, 57(2), 175–196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-018-9363-3

Kassab, O., Mutz, R., & Daniel, H.-D. (2019). Introducing and testing an advanced quantitative methodological approach for the evaluation of research centers: a case study on sustainability science. Research Evaluation, rvz029. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvz029

Kessler, S. H., Fähnrich, B., & Schäfer, M. S. (2019). Science communication research in the German-speaking countries: A content analysis of conference abstracts. Studies in Communication Sciences, 19(2), 243–251–243–251. https://doi.org/10.24434/j.scoms.2019.02.012

Kleinen-von Königslöw, K., Post, S., & Schäfer, M. S. (2019). How news media (de-)legitimize national and international climate politics – A content analysis of newspaper coverage in five countries. International Communication Gazette, 81(6–8), 518–540. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048518825092

Kordts-Freudinger, R., & Van Treeck, T. (2019). Auf wissenschaftlichen Tagungen auch noch was lernen: Tagungsformate bei der Jahrestagung der dghd 2017. In Y.-B. Böhler, S. Heuchemer, & B. Szczyrba (Eds.), Hochschuldidaktik erforscht wissenschaftliche Perspektiven auf Lehren und Lernen. Profilbil-dung und Wertefragen in der Hochschulentwicklung IV (pp. 51–62). TH Köln. https://www.alexandria.unisg.ch

Kövér, Á., & Franger, G. (Eds.). (2019). Leaving the ivory tower: universities’ third mission and the quest for legitimacy. In University and society: interdependencies and exchange (pp. 39–57). EE | Edward Elgar Publishing.

Lepori, B., Geuna, A., & Mira, A. (2019). Scientific output scales with resources. A comparison of US and European universities. PLoS ONE, 14(10). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0223415

Lepori, B., Guerini, M., Scherngell, T., & Laredo, P. (2019). The spatial distribution of knowledge production in Europe. Evidence from KET and SGC. 1, 685–690. Scopus.

Lepori, Benedetto, & Greco, S. (2019). 18. Grant proposal writing as a dialogic process. De Gruyter Mouton. https://www.degruyter.com

Mantegazzini, B. A., & Lepori, B. (2019). HEIs participations and mobility in the European Framework Programmes. 1, 1262–1269. Scopus.

Metag, J., & Schäfer, M. S. (2019). Hochschulkommunikation in Online-Medien und Social Media. In B. Fähnrich, J. Metag, S. Post, & M. S. Schäfer (Eds.), Forschungsfeld Hochschulkommunikation (pp. 363–391). Springer Fachmedien. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-22409-7_17

Mutz, R., & Daniel, H.-D. (2019a). How Should We Measure Individual Researcher`s Performance Capacity Within and Between Universities? A Multilevel Extension of the Bibliometric Quotient (BQ). In G. Catalano, C. Daraio, Gregori, Moed, & G. Ruoca (Eds.), Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Scientometrics & Informetrics ISSI, September 2-5, 2019 Sapienza University Rom, Italy (pp. 1098–1109). International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics. https://www.zora.uzh.ch/id/eprint/179092/

Mutz, R., & Daniel, H.-D. (2019b). How to consider fractional counting and field normalization in the statistical modeling of bibliometric data: A multilevel Poisson regression approach. Journal of Informetrics, 13(2), 643–657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2019.03.007

Oehmer, F., & Jarren, O. (2019). Foundations as organisational science policy interfaces? An analysis of the references to foundations made during parliamentary debates in the German federal parliament. Journal of Science Communication, 18(3), A06. https://doi.org/10.22323/2.18030206

Post, S., Kleinen-von Königslöw, K., & Schäfer, M. S. (2019). Between Guilt and Obligation: Debating the Responsibility for Climate Change and Climate Politics in the Media. Environmental Communication, 13(6), 723–739. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2018.1446037

Reinhart, M. (2019). Fraud and Misconduct in Research: Detection, Investigation, and Organizational Response by Nachman Ben-Yehuda and Amalya Oliver-Lumerman. American Journal of Sociology, 124(5), 1598–1600. https://doi.org/10.1086/701692

Rost, K., & Osterloh, M. (Eds.). (2019). Der Zufallsmechanismus: ein neues Paradigma für bessere Entscheidungen. Zeitschrift Für Organisation n (ZfO), 3/2019.

Schäfer, M. S., Kessler, S. H., & Fähnrich, B. (2019). Analyzing science communication through the lens of communication science: Reviewing the empirical evidence. In A. Leßmöllmann, M. Dascal, & T. Gloning (Eds.), Science Communication (pp. 77–104). De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110255522-004

Schäfer, M. S., & North, P. (2019). Are social media making constructive climate policymaking harder? In M. Hulme (Ed.), Contemporary Climate Change Debates. Routledge. 

Scharrer, L., Stadtler, M., & Bromme, R. (2019a). Biased recipients encounter biased sources: Effect of ethical (dis‐)agreement between recipient and author on evaluating scientific claims. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 33(6), 1165–1177. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3563

Scharrer, L., Stadtler, M., & Bromme, R. (2019b). Judging scientific information: Does source evaluation prevent the seductive effect of text easiness? Learning and Instruction, 63, 101215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2019.101215

Sporn, B. (2019). Adaptive University Structures. In P. O. Teixeira, A. Veiga, M. J. Rosa, & A. M. Magalhães (Eds.), Under pressure: higher education institutions coping with multiple challenges (pp. 37–54). Brill Sense.

Thies, K., & Kordts-Freudinger, R. (2019a). German higher education academic staff’s positive emotions through work domains. International Journal of Educational Research, 98, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2019.08.004

Thies, K., & Kordts-Freudinger, R. (2019b). University academics’ state emotions and appraisal antecedents: an intraindividual analysis. Studies in Higher Education, 44(10), 1723–1733. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1665311

Teixeira, P. N., Veiga, A., João Machado Pires da Rosa, M., & Magalhães, A. (2019). Under Pressure: Higher Education Institutions Coping with Multiple Challenges. BRILL.

van der Beek, S., Bellhäuser, H., Karlen, Y., & Hertel, S. (2019). New ways in fostering self-regulated learning at university: How  effective are web-based courses when compared to regular attendance-based courses? Zeitschrift Für Pädagogische Psychologie, 34(2), 117–129. https://doi.org/10.1024/1010-0652/a000254

Widmer, T., Eberli, D., & Frey, K. (2019). Evaluation of the human research act: analysis of the quality of selected human research projects. Widmer, Thomas; Eberli, Daniela; Frey, Kathrin  (2019). Evaluation of the Human Research Act: Analysis of the Quality of Selected Human Research Projects.  Zurich: University of Zurich. Dept. of Political Science. https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-184264

Widmer, T., Frey, K., Eberli, D., Schläpfer, B., & Rickenbacher, J. (2019). Evaluation des Humanforschungsgesetzes (HFG): Schlussbericht. Widmer, Thomas; Frey, Kathrin; Eberli, Daniela; Schläpfer, Basil; Rickenbacher, Julia  (2019). Evaluation des Humanforschungsgesetzes (HFG): Schlussbericht.  Zürich: Institut für Politikwissenschaft. https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-178458

Wilhelm, E. (2019a). Aufklärung und Wissenschaft in der Krise : Wiederbelebung der Religionen? https://doi.org/10.21256/ZHAW-18448

Wilhelm, E. (2019b). The university as an open platform? : a critique of agility. https://doi.org/10.21256/ZHAW-18134

Wilhelm, E. (2019c). Wissenschaft und Demokratie in der Krise? Neue Zürcher Zeitung, 9. https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-18228

Zacharewicz, T., Lepori, B., Reale, E., & Jonkers, K. (2019). Performance-based research funding in EU Member States - A comparative assessment. Science and Public Policy, 46(1), 105–115. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scy041